Post-earnings deep dive · August 5, 2026

GlobalFoundries: AI growth is real. The earnings conversion was not strong enough.

GFS is down because the quarter cleared the published bar but did not clear the market's higher bar. The revenue beat was only about 1%, Q3 was roughly in line, and the 62% data-center growth came with weaker mobile and auto demand, rising R&D and capital intensity, flat guided operating margin, and almost no Q2 free cash flow. The selloff began immediately after the 7:07 ET filing and before the 8:30 call, so the release and outlook were the trigger; broader mature-node weakness amplified it.

PM posture: wait for conversion proofCausal confidence: highNASDAQ: GFSReported: Q2 2026Tape cut-off: Aug. 5, 2:30 ETPrice: $49.33 / -5.17%
Direct answer
This is an expectations and cash-conversion reset, not an AI-demand thesis break.

What was good: Q2 revenue of $1.786B beat the Fiscal.ai pre-print mean by 1.2%; non-IFRS EPS of $0.46 beat by 6.5%; non-IFRS gross margin reached 29.9%; and communications infrastructure/data center grew 62% year over year. S1S4S8

What failed the stock: revenue was only $1M above the company guide high, Q3 revenue and EPS midpoints were only 0.5% and 3.4% above the Fiscal.ai means, adjusted EBITDA margin fell 180bp year over year, and adjusted FCF was -$3M as net capital expenditures reached $408M. S1S3S8J1

Investment read: the AI/optical thesis strengthened, but the whole-company estimate path remains mixed. At roughly 19.6x the current 2027 EPS mean, the stock needs mobile stabilization, the promised Q4 auto recovery, and materially better FCF conversion. S8J7

Decision hinge
Business thesisStrengthened in optical networking; SiPho should more than double in 2026 and SiGe is oversubscribed through 2027. S5
Estimate pathModestly positive revenue/EPS, but lower-quality: Q3 operating margin is guided flat sequentially while opex rises.
Stock thesisMixed. The July derating removed much of the exuberance, but 2027 expectations still require a back-end-loaded recovery.
Action disciplineWait for proof. Do not treat the 5% decline as a thesis break or automatic bargain.
Next proofQ3 GM near 30.5%, opex discipline, Q4 auto/mobile bridge, and full-year adjusted FCF margin near 10%. S4S5
Q2 revenue surprise
+1.2%
$1.786B vs $1.765B Fiscal.ai mean; only $1M above company high. S8S3
Q3 guide delta
+0.5%
$1.885B midpoint vs $1.875B mean: effectively in line. S1S8
AI / data center
+62%
$277M, or 15.5% of Q2 revenue. S4J2
Q2 adjusted FCF
-$3M
-0.2% margin; net capex was $408M / 22.8% of revenue. S1J3
Tape move
-5.17%
$49.33 at 2:30 ET vs $52.02 prior close; SOXX was about -1%. S6S7
Aug. 4 close
$52.02

Up 4.0% on the day and 10.5% from July 29. S7J4

7:00 ET premarket
$53.14

Before the SEC acceptance at 7:07:34 ET. S6S7

8:00 ET pre-call
$49.11

The negative judgment was already in the tape before the call. S7

2:30 ET
$49.33

-5.17%; 10.4% below the premarket high. S6J5

Causal hierarchy

Why the stock is down after a numerical beat.

Price causality is inferred from the timing and cross-section. The ranking distinguishes reported evidence from judgment and includes a falsifier for each explanation.

The beat and Q3 guide were too small for the expectation bar

Q2 revenue beat published consensus by only about 1% and finished just $1M above the company guide high. The Q3 revenue midpoint was roughly in line with the pre-print mean; the EPS midpoint was only modestly above. The stock began falling within the 7:05 ET bar after the filing. S3S7S8

Falsifier: post-print estimates rise materially enough to show that the apparent inline guide was actually well above the live investor bar.

High

Growth did not convert cleanly into operating leverage or cash

Revenue rose 6% year over year, but adjusted EBITDA dollars were virtually flat and adjusted EBITDA margin fell 180bp. Q2 adjusted FCF collapsed to -$3M as net capex rose to $408M; Q3 guides non-IFRS operating margin to 16.7% at midpoint, flat sequentially despite 5.5% revenue growth. S1J6

Falsifier: Q3 lands above the 30.5% GM midpoint, opex stays below $260M and FCF turns strongly positive.

High

AI strength is still too small to offset mobile and auto weakness

Communications infrastructure/data center grew 62% but represented only 15.5% of revenue. Mobile and auto together were 54.7%; both declined year over year. Management lowered the 2026 mobile view to down low teens and left the auto recovery weighted to Q4. S4S5J2

Falsifier: optical/SiGe growth accelerates faster than modeled while mobile stabilizes and auto catches up without a Q4 miss.

High

Spending arrives before the earnings benefit

Second-half quarterly non-IFRS opex should stay near the Q3 $260M level, full-year capex intensity should land at the high end of the 15%-20% range, and customer pricing increases do not enter revenue until 2027. S5

Falsifier: acquisition revenue and mix more than fund the R&D step-up, while government proceeds materially reduce net capex.

Medium-high

Mature-node and analog weakness amplified the move

At roughly the same time, SOXX was near -1%, while UMC, ON, NXPI and STM were all down more than the broad semiconductor benchmark. GFS still underperformed SOXX by about four percentage points, preserving a company-specific component. S6

Falsifier: the peer basket rebounds while GFS remains weak on estimate cuts or new company-specific evidence.

Medium

Reaction path: release rejection before the call

Fallback: $52.02 prior close → $53.14 at 7:00 ET → $50.64 at 7:05 → $49.11 at 8:00 → $49.27 at the 8:30 call start → $47.82 at 9:00 → $51.40 at 9:30 → $49.33 at 2:30.

Five-minute Yahoo Finance data; the SEC accepted the 6-K at 7:07:34 ET. Extended-hours prints can be noisy, but the direction and timing are clear. S6S7

Same-time tape: GFS underperformed the sector

Fallback: GFS -5.17%, SOXX about -1.0%, SMH about flat, TSM about -0.2%, ON -3.6%, NXPI -2.5%, STM -2.7%, UMC -6.6%.

Nasdaq quote snapshot around 2:26-2:30 ET. Peer moves can include issuer-specific news and are context, not a causal proof. S6

Beat, miss and growth trajectory

A strong gross-margin print with weaker operating and cash translation.

All amounts are USD. Consensus is the Fiscal.ai contributor mean retrieved after the print; historical estimate values are the provider's stored pre-report observations.

MetricReported / guidedBenchmarkDeltaRead-throughSource
Q2 revenue$1.786B$1.765B mean+$21M / +1.2%Only $1M above the company guide high; good, not a blowout.S1S3S8
Q2 non-IFRS EPS$0.46$0.432 mean+$0.028 / +6.5%Near the high end of company guidance, but $0.02 below the $0.48 ceiling; the EPS-quality bridge is material.S1S3S8
Q2 non-IFRS GM29.9%28.5% guide mid+140bp40bp above the company guide high; the cleanest upside.S1S3
Q2 IFRS operating margin9.7%11.7% guide mid-200bp20bp below the low, reflecting acquisition, SBC and SG&A/R&D pressure.S1S2S3
Q3 revenue midpoint$1.885B$1.875B mean+$10M / +0.5%Effectively in line; +5.5% sequentially.S1S8J1
Q3 non-IFRS EPS midpoint$0.51$0.493 mean+$0.017 / +3.4%Modest upside, with a wide $0.46-$0.56 company range.S1S8

Five-quarter financial trend

Fallback: revenue $1.688B, $1.688B, $1.830B, $1.634B, $1.786B; gross profit $408M, $419M, $508M, $451M, $505M; net income $228M, $249M, $200M, $104M, $167M; non-IFRS operating margin 15.3%, 15.4%, 18.3%, 16.6%, 16.7%.

Operating margin is non-IFRS because GAAP net income and operating income are distorted by SBC, acquisitions, tax and investment items; this is the more decision-useful recurring margin. S1S11S12

Non-IFRS EPS: actual versus estimate

Fallback: Q2'25 $0.42 vs $0.359; Q3'25 $0.41 vs $0.389; Q4'25 $0.55 vs $0.473; Q1'26 $0.40 vs $0.351; Q2'26 $0.46 vs $0.432.

Consistent non-IFRS/adjusted EPS basis. The latest surprise was positive but smaller than the prior four quarters. S8S11S12

Company-specific drivers

One portfolio, two different cycles.

AI networking is accelerating, but the larger mobile and auto businesses still control near-term aggregate earnings.

End marketQ2 revenueMixYoYQoQInvestor read
Smart mobile$644M36.1%-6%+15%2026 outlook cut to down low teens on memory pricing/shortages.
Communications infrastructure & data center$277M15.5%+62%+20%Best growth corridor; SiPho and SiGe demand are capacity-constrained.
Home & industrial IoT$331M18.5%+10%+30%Some mobile capacity/demand is reallocating into IoT.
Automotive$333M18.6%-10%-13%Customer shipment timing pushes the maintained recovery into Q4.
Technology services$201M11.3%+21%-4%Acquisitions add revenue and margin but also drive the R&D step-up.

Mix percentages are analyst-derived from Q2 revenue and may differ by 0.1 point from rounded company presentation values. S4S5J2

EPS quality and capital intensity

The $0.46 adjusted EPS is the operating benchmark, but the bridge is large.

GAAP EPS is not a clean recurring-profit proxy this quarter. The bridge contains recurring SBC, acquisition-related expense, a gain on equity investments and a tax item.

Bridge stepEPSAfter-tax amountTreatment / read-throughSource
Reported IFRS diluted EPS$0.30$167M net incomeStarting point.S1
Add: share-based compensation+$0.15+$83MNon-cash but recurring dilution/economic cost; the largest adjustment.S1
Add: structural optimization+$0.01+$5MWorkforce/manufacturing-footprint item.S1
Add: acquired intangibles and acquisition charges+$0.06+$31MExcludes M&A integration/amortization; increasingly relevant as GF expands IP capabilities.S1
Less: investment revaluation/sale gain-$0.04-$20MNon-operating benefit removed.S1
Less: tax matters-$0.02-$10MGerman deferred-tax FX item removed.S1
Non-IFRS diluted EPS$0.46$256M net incomeClosest company operating benchmark; not equivalent to cash earnings.S1

Free cash flow

-$3M in Q2, down from $233M in Q1 and $277M in Q2 2025. Full-year adjusted FCF margin is still expected near 10%, making the second-half bridge load-bearing. S1S5

Capital intensity

Q2 net capex was $408M, or 22.8% of revenue. Management now expects full-year capex at the high end of 15%-20% of revenue as optical/SiGe capacity expands. S1S5J3

Balance-sheet cushion

Cash, equivalents and marketable securities ended Q2 at $3.3B; cash alone was $1.087B. The cushion funds the ramp, but Q2 acquisitions and capex materially increased investing outflows. S1S2

Quality-of-print conclusion: revenue and non-IFRS gross margin were strong, but the stock is correctly looking past those headlines. The key mismatch is that better mix and volume are not yet producing matching EBITDA-margin or FCF growth.
Transcript and debate map

The call confirmed the strategic upside and the timing risk.

The available transcript is a Quartr machine transcript. Paraphrases below are checked against timestamps; official release/deck numbers control. No tariffs were discussed.

1. Capacity is the optical bottleneck

Chris Caso, Wolfe Research → Tim Breen · 33:09-36:13 S5
Answer: GF is adding SiPho/SiGe capacity inside existing fabs; productivity and tool additions should increase output through 2H26 and 2027. The $300M federal LOI also supports future materials and advanced packaging.
Debate: demand looks supply-constrained, but capacity timing is now the execution bottleneck. Next check: Q3/Q4 CID revenue and tool qualification.

2. Mix—not price—is carrying 2026 margin

Chris Caso, Wolfe Research → Sam Franklin · 36:22-39:04 S5
Answer: mix, technology services, productivity and cost work drive the margin bridge; pricing is a 2027 contributor. Utilization was in the high 80s, leaving room to absorb more volume.
Debate: the 30% FY26 GM outlook is credible, but it depends on mix before price helps. Next check: Q3 30.5% GM midpoint.

3. The optical outlook is demand-backed—but not backlog-backed

Krish Sankar, TD Cowen → Tim Breen · 39:51-41:00 S5
Answer: customers repeatedly ask for more supply; management says hyperscaler checks support demand and calls key corridors oversold.
Debate: strong evidence of demand, but no quantified backlog, take-or-pay volume or customer concentration was disclosed. Next check: SiPho shipment and design-win conversion.

4. Acquisitions fund growth but lift the cost base

Karl Ackerman, BNP Paribas → Tim Breen / Sam Franklin · 43:56-48:47 S5
Answer: MIPS/ARC/Photeon add technology-services and power-design capability. Expected 2026 acquired revenue rose to $100M-$120M, weighted one-third to Q3 and two-thirds to Q4; higher R&D should be largely covered by that revenue.
Debate: revenue-generative M&A is positive, but the contribution and cost coverage are back-end weighted. Next check: Q3/Q4 technology-services revenue and $260M opex cadence.

5. NPO/CPO remain future ramps

Karl Ackerman, BNP Paribas → Tim Breen · 48:46-50:24 S5
Answer: SCALE engagements span NPO and CPO; management still expects NPO to begin ramping in 2027 and CPO in 2028.
Debate: the platform is broad, but the most strategic packaging upside is not a 2026 earnings driver. Next check: production qualifications and volume design wins.

6. The full-year bridge requires a roughly 10% December step-up

Tim Arcuri, UBS → Sam Franklin / Tim Breen · 55:52-58:26 S5
Answer: management agreed with the analyst's approximate Q4 sequential-growth inference. Mobile is down low teens for 2026; auto should recover in 2H; IoT rises 10%-15%; CID rises 50%-60%.
Debate: flexible capacity helps, but the annual case is visibly back-end loaded. Next check: Q4 auto catch-up and mobile forecast stability.

7. SiPho customer breadth does not prove revenue breadth

Tim Arcuri, UBS → Tim Breen · 58:36-60:11 S5
Answer: GF has more than 40 SiPho customers and sees geopolitical diversification as a demand tailwind; management does not consider concentration a concern.
Debate: engagement breadth is encouraging, but high-volume revenue concentration was not disclosed. Next check: customer mix and competitive pricing as other foundries expand.

8. Capex leads the earnings benefit

CJ Muse, Cantor Fitzgerald → Sam Franklin / Tim Breen · 60:26-64:31 S5
Answer: GF reiterated 30%+ long-term CID growth, sees room to expand photonics capacity within existing fabs, and expects capex near the high end of 15%-20% of revenue. Tool install and qualification create a lag.
Debate: brownfield capacity can create leverage, but cash goes out before revenue arrives. Next check: 2027 CID growth, utilization and the margin path toward the 2028 target.
Transcript limitation: the Q&A was not the initial selloff trigger; the stock had already fallen from $53.14 at 7:00 ET to $49.11 by 8:00 ET, before the 8:30 call. The call then supplied context for why the market rejected the release. S7S5
Valuation and what is priced in

At $49.33, a recovery is priced—but not the full optical bull case.

Consensus is current Fiscal.ai contributor data retrieved after the print. Scenario multiples are analyst assumptions, not company guidance, consensus targets or recommendations.

Current earnings valuation

2026E EPSMean $1.90 / median $1.91 → 26.0x / 25.8x.
2027E EPSMean $2.52 / median $2.47 → 19.6x / 20.0x.
2028E EPSMean $3.40 / median $3.17 → 14.5x / 15.6x.
Provider NTM24.9x P/E and 10.4x EV/EBITDA on the Fiscal.ai snapshot.

Estimates are not yet a clean post-call revised set. Counts: 19 for 2026 EPS, 18 for 2027 and 9 for 2028. S8J7

What the price requires

  • Communications infrastructure/data center sustains 30%+ growth beyond the 2026 step-up.
  • Q4 validates the auto timing explanation rather than revealing end-demand erosion.
  • Mobile stops worsening after the low-teens 2026 decline.
  • Non-IFRS GM clears 30% while opex and capex growth normalize.
  • Adjusted FCF margin reaches roughly 10% for 2026 and improves thereafter.
Translation: today's price supports a watchlist or hold posture, but a higher-conviction add needs proof that optical mix converts into cash earnings.
Bear screen
$31-$36

2027 low EPS $2.24 × 14-16x. Mobile/auto remain weak, capex stays elevated and FCF misses.

Base screen
$44-$52

2027 median EPS $2.47 × 18-21x. Optical growth offsets legacy weakness and cash conversion improves.

Bull screen
$72-$81

2027 high EPS $3.25 × 22-25x. Capacity ramps on time, mix accelerates and 2028 targets gain credibility.

Derived ranges: EPS estimate × selected P/E. They are sensitivity screens, not price targets. S8J8

Two-year stock history and major events

Fallback: GFS rose from roughly $35 in April 2025 to $92.55 in May 2026, then fell to $52.02 before the print and $49.33 intraday on Aug. 5.

Monthly Yahoo closes with the current Aug. 5 intraday point. Event annotations use official company disclosures. S7S9S10S13

Read-throughs and market events

The report strengthens optical suppliers' demand signal—and weakens the consumer edge.

These are directional research read-throughs, not claims that another issuer's revenue or stock must move one-for-one with GFS.

Positive read-throughs

  • Optical networking: 62% CID/data-center growth, seven Q2 optical design wins, SiPho more than doubling and SiGe oversubscription reinforce the AI interconnect cycle. S4S5
  • Specialty foundry pricing: customer price increases for 2027 suggest better discipline in differentiated corridors, though there is no 2026 benefit. S5
  • U.S. supply-chain policy: the $300M silicon-photonics LOI and expected $375M quantum LOI improve the long-duration strategic option value. S13

Negative / mixed read-throughs

  • Smartphones: memory pricing and shortages pushed the 2026 mobile outlook to down low teens, a warning for RF/power and handset-adjacent demand. S5
  • Automotive semis: Q2 revenue fell 10% year over year, while the maintained annual growth view relies more heavily on Q4 shipment timing. S4S5
  • Foundry cash intensity: near-term AI capacity can absorb cash well before qualification and volume revenue; Tower and UMC tape weakness shows the market is sensitive to that trade-off. S6S5
Date / windowEventWhy it matters nowSource
May 7, 2026Investor Day and first dividendEstablished the long-term growth/margin frame and shareholder-return policy against which this quarter is judged.S9
June 2, 2026Synopsys ARC IP acquisition closedExpands physical-AI/custom-silicon scope, but raises R&D and acquisition adjustments before full revenue conversion.S10
July 29, 2026$300M U.S. silicon-photonics award LOISupports advanced materials and packaging; strategically positive, but not a direct offset to all near-term capacity capex.S13
September 8, 2026Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology ConferenceNext scheduled management checkpoint for mobile, capacity and capital-intensity language.S5
Q3/Q4 2026Capacity, auto and FCF proof windowDetermines whether the selloff was an overreaction or the first estimate reset.S1S5
News scan: Reuters' same-day headline emphasized that GFS topped estimates on AI demand; no same-day post-print rating or price-target change was found by the 2:30 ET cut-off. That supports an expectations/quality explanation rather than a fresh analyst downgrade. S14
Catalysts, falsifiers and action rules

What would change the call.

The most useful next signal is conversion—not another design-win headline.

WindowProof pointBull signalBear / falsifierSource basis
Q3 2026Revenue $1.860B-$1.910B; non-IFRS GM 29.5%-31.5%; opex $250M-$270MRevenue in upper half, GM ≥30.5%, opex below midpointRevenue lands but op margin stays flat/down because spending absorbs mixS1
Q3/Q4 2026Optical capacity and CID revenueSupply additions qualify on time; 50%-60% FY growth is met or exceededDemand remains strong but capacity/productivity delays shipmentsS5
Q4 2026Auto recovery and total-company sequential growthAuto shipment timing catches up and revenue rises near the implied 10%Customer timing explanation fails; full-year auto growth is cutS5
FY 2026Adjusted FCF margin near 10%Cash conversion rebounds despite high-end capex intensityCapacity/R&D spend persists without the needed revenue and grant offsetS5
2027Pricing, NPO and SiGe/SiPho mixPrice increases enter revenue as next-generation optical ramps beginCompetition/multi-sourcing erodes pricing or qualification timelines slipS5

Thesis killers

  • Q3 non-IFRS gross margin misses the 29.5% low despite strong CID demand.
  • Mobile weakens beyond the low-teens decline while auto fails to catch up in Q4.
  • Full-year adjusted FCF margin misses roughly 10% because capex/opex remain structurally higher.
  • SiPho/SiGe demand stays strong but capacity, yield or qualification prevents revenue conversion.
  • SBC and acquisition adjustments remain a persistently rising share of adjusted EPS.

Action framework

Existing holder: hold/watch rather than sell solely on the headline decline; require Q3 margin and Q4 timing proof before adding.

New capital: wait for either a lower price with asymmetric downside support or stronger evidence that optical growth converts into FCF.

What would upgrade the stance: upper-half Q3 revenue, ≥30.5% GM, disciplined opex and a credible full-year cash bridge.

What would force a re-underwrite: another mobile cut, auto delay or FCF downgrade.

Evidence ledger

Sources, definitions and analytical judgments.

Official filings and issuer materials control. Market and consensus data are time-stamped; derived calculations are separately labeled.

S1
GFS Q2 2026 earnings release, Form 6-K Exhibit 99.1
Reported P&L, guidance, cash flow, EPS reconciliation and non-IFRS definitions; filed Aug. 5, 2026.
Primary · SEC / issuer
S2
GFS Q2 2026 interim report and MD&A
End-market drivers, ASP/wafer detail, operating expenses, acquisitions, cash and balance-sheet analysis.
Primary · SEC filing
S3
GFS Q1 2026 release
Controlling prior Q2 company guidance and Q1 comparison.
Primary · SEC / issuer
S4
GFS Q2 2026 earnings presentation
Slides 19-23: end-market revenue, capital allocation and Q3 guidance.
Primary · issuer deck
S5
GFS Q2 2026 call machine transcript · official event page
Prepared remarks and Q&A; timestamps/participants are shown in the debate map. Official numbers control.
Transcript · Aug. 5
S6
Nasdaq GFS quote · SOXX · UMC
GFS traded around $49.33-$49.34 / -5.15% to -5.17% around 2:26-2:30 ET; peer quote snapshot uses the same window.
Market data · intraday
S7
Yahoo Finance GFS intraday chart API · two-year monthly history
Premarket/regular reaction path, recent closes and price-history chart; retrieved Aug. 5 around 2:25-2:30 ET.
Market data · time-stamped
S8
Fiscal.ai GFS dataset
NasdaqGS-GFS; quarterly/annual revenue and EPS estimates plus valuation snapshot retrieved Aug. 5 around 2:15 ET through the local wrapper. Contributor identities are not exposed.
Provider · consensus / valuation
S9
GFS 2026 Investor Day 6-K
Long-term framework, first dividend and shareholder-return policy.
Primary · issuer
S10
GFS closes Synopsys ARC Processor IP acquisition
June 2, 2026 strategic transaction context.
Primary · issuer
S11
GFS Q3 2025 release
Historical quarterly actuals and non-IFRS metrics.
Primary · issuer
S12
GFS Q4/FY2025 release · Q1 2026 release
Historical quarterly trend and adjusted EPS comparisons.
Primary · issuer
S13
$300M silicon-photonics award LOI · Quantum Technology Solutions launch
Government-support and strategic-option context.
Primary · issuer / policy
S14
Reuters: GlobalFoundries tops estimates on AI chip demand
Same-day major-news scan; no negative analyst action was identified by the report cut-off.
Secondary · news
J1
Guide and surprise math: midpoint = (low + high) / 2; delta = reported or midpoint minus Fiscal.ai mean; surprise = delta / mean.
Analyst-derived · high confidence
J2
End-market mix = reported end-market revenue / $1.786B Q2 revenue. Mobile + auto = ($644M + $333M) / $1.786B = 54.7%; CID = $277M / $1.786B = 15.5%.
Analyst-derived · high confidence
J3
Q2 net capex intensity = $408M / $1.786B = 22.8%; adjusted FCF margin = -$3M / $1.786B = -0.2%.
Analyst-derived · high confidence
J4
Run-up = $52.02 / $47.07 - 1 = 10.5% from the July 29 close; Aug. 4 daily return = $52.02 / $50.01 - 1 = 4.0%.
Analyst-derived · market data
J5
Drawdown from the $55.08 premarket high to $49.33 at 2:30 ET = -10.4%.
Analyst-derived · market data
J6
Q3 sequential revenue growth at midpoint = $1.885B / $1.786B - 1 = 5.5%; non-IFRS operating margin midpoint remains 16.7% versus Q2 16.7%.
Analyst-derived · high confidence
J7
Forward P/E = $49.33 / Fiscal.ai EPS mean or median for the stated year.
Analyst-derived · estimate-sensitive
J8
Scenario value = 2027 low/median/high EPS × selected P/E range. Multiples are analytical assumptions, not consensus.
Analyst-derived · illustrative